KEYNOTE-434 part B: A phase 1 study evaluating the combination of epacadostat, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor) was well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors in part A of the nonrandomized, open-label, phase 1 KEYNOTE-434 study (NCT02862457). We report results from part B, which evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Eligible patients aged ≥ 20 years had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with no prior systemic therapy, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received epacadostat 100 mg orally twice-daily, pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every-3-weeks for ≤ 35 cycles, and 4 cycles of chemotherapy (cohort 1: cisplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 2: carboplatin plus pemetrexed, non-squamous; cohort 3: carboplatin plus paclitaxel, squamous or non-squamous). Primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Following unfavorable results from other studies, a protocol amendment removed epacadostat from the treatment combination. RESULTS: Of 19 patients, 7 were enrolled in cohort 1, and 6 each in cohorts 2 and 3. Median follow-up was 13.7 (range, 4.2-27.8) months. Five of 17 (29%) DLT-evaluable patients experienced ≥ 1 DLT (cohort 1, n = 1; cohorts 2 and 3, n = 2 each); most commonly maculopapular rash (grade 3, n = 3) and increased alanine aminotransferase (grade 2, n = 1; grade 3, n = 2). All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs); 58% experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs. Objective response rate was 47%. CONCLUSION: The combination of epacadostat plus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was found to be tolerable in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02862457.

Distinction of ALK fusion gene- and EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer with tumor markers.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to predict gene mutations individually based on clinical background alone. Tumor markers may help to predict each gene mutation. Identifying tumor markers that can predict gene mutation will facilitate timely genetic testing and intervention. METHODS: We selected 134 cases of advanced or recurrent ALK-positive and 172 cases of advanced or recurrent EGFR-positive lung cancer from our clinical database. The cutoff values for the tumor markers were defined as 5.0 ng/mL or higher for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and 3.5 ng/mL or higher for soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA21-1) in accordance with the institutional standards. A positive CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was defined as 0.7 or higher. RESULTS: The CEA-positivity rate was 49% for ALK-positive lung cancers and 73% for EGFR-positive lung cancers, which was significantly different (p < 0.001). The CYFRA21-1 positivity rate was significantly higher in ALK-positive lung cancer (36%) compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer (23%) (p = 0.034). The median CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was 0.395 for the ALK group, which was significantly higher compared with 0.098 for the EGFR group (p < 0.001). These trends were similar when excluding histology other than adenocarcinoma. The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) for initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was 308 days for the high CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group and 617 days for the low CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group for ALK-positive lung cancer (p = 0.100). CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of patients with ALK-positive lung cancer were CYFRA21-1 positive and had higher CYFRA21-1:CEA ratios compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

Prophylactic pegfilgrastim reduces febrile neutropenia in ramucirumab plus docetaxel after chemoimmunotherapy in advanced NSCLC: post hoc analysis from NEJ051.

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.

Efficacy of osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND: As an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), osimertinib has emerged as a standard EGFR-mutation positive treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of osimertinib for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, comparing those with and without MPE. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with osimertinib at our hospital between April 2016 and June 2021. TTF was defined as the duration from osimertinib initiation to discontinuation, and OS as the duration until death, irrespective of the reason. RESULTS: Among 229 patients receiving osimertinib, 84 had MPE before administration, 39 acquired EGFR exon20 T790M mutation following previous EGFR-TKI therapy, and 45 were EGFR-TKI-naive. Among EGFR-TKI-naive patients, median TTF was 14.8 and 19.8 months for those with and without MPE, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-2.18; p = 0.12). Median OS was 32.0 and 42.0 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.43; 95% CI: 0.86-2.38; p = 0.16). Among patients with T790M mutation, median TTF was 12.3 and 13.1 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.55; p = 0.88). Median OS for patients with and without MPE was 23.2 and 24.7 months, respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72-1.67; p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Among patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, the evidence of MPE has little effect on survival with osimertinib.

NOTCH1 and CREBBP co-mutations negatively affect the benefit of adjuvant therapy in completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC: translational research of phase III IMPACT study.

The phase III IMPACT study (UMIN000044738) compared adjuvant gefitinib with cisplatin plus vinorelbine (cis/vin) in completely resected epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was not met, we searched for molecular predictors of adjuvant gefitinib efficacy. Of 234 patients enrolled in the IMPACT study, 202 patients were analyzed for 409 cancer-related gene mutations and tumor mutation burden using resected lung cancer specimens. Frequent somatic mutations included tumor protein p53 (TP53; 58.4%), CUB and Sushi multiple domains 3 (CSMD3; 11.8%), and NOTCH1 (9.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that NOTCH1 co-mutation was a significant poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in the gefitinib group and cAMP response element binding protein (CREBBP) co-mutation for DFS and OS in the cis/vin group. In patients with NOTCH1 co-mutations, gefitinib group had a shorter OS than cis/vin group (Hazard ratio 5.49, 95% CI 1.07-28.00), with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.039). In patients with CREBBP co-mutations, the gefitinib group had a longer DFS than the cis/vin group, with a significant interaction (P for interaction = 0.058). In completely resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, NOTCH1 and CREBBP mutations might predict poor outcome in patients treated with gefitinib and cis/vin, respectively.

Atezolizumab and Platinum Plus Pemetrexed With or Without Bevacizumab for Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results: A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.

Osimertinib with or without Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Evidence suggests that the addition of chemotherapy may extend the benefits of EGFR-TKI therapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, open-label trial, we randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not previously received treatment for advanced disease to receive osimertinib (80 mg once daily) with chemotherapy (pemetrexed [500 mg per square meter of body-surface area] plus either cisplatin [75 mg per square meter] or carboplatin [pharmacologically guided dose]) or to receive osimertinib monotherapy (80 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Response and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 557 patients underwent randomization. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group than in the osimertinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 24 months, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and 41% (95% CI, 35 to 47) of those in the osimertinib group were alive and progression-free. Progression-free survival as assessed according to blinded independent central review was consistent with the primary analysis (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.80). An objective (complete or partial) response was observed in 83% of the patients in the osimertinib-chemotherapy group and in 76% of those in the osimertinib group; the median response duration was 24.0 months (95% CI, 20.9 to 27.8) and 15.3 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.4), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events from any cause was higher with the combination than with monotherapy - a finding driven by known chemotherapy-related adverse events. The safety profile of osimertinib plus pemetrexed and a platinum-based agent was consistent with the established profiles of the individual agents. CONCLUSIONS: First-line treatment with osimertinib-chemotherapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than osimertinib monotherapy among patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04035486.).

Clinical characteristics of patients with KRAS mutation detected by liquid biopsy.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutation positive lung cancer is known to be clinically characterized by older age, males, and smokers. It is reported to be more common in mucinous adenocarcinoma, but all reports are based on analysis of tissue samples. Recently, blood samples have become available for analysis, suggesting a low detection rate of circulating tumor DNA in histological types, especially mucinous adenocarcinoma. In this study, we investigated the clinical characteristics of KRAS mutation-positive cases in the analysis of blood specimens, as these remain unclear. METHODS: The clinical background of patients with KRAS mutation among those who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis using blood samples was evaluated. RESULTS: NGS analysis was performed on 214 blood samples. KRAS mutations were detected in blood samples in 33 cases (15.4%), of which 31 cases (14.5%) had a histological pathology diagnosis. Mucinous adenocarcinoma accounted for 28.6% of cases with positive blood and tissue specimens, 10.0% of cases with positive blood specimens only, and 57.1% of cases with positive tissue specimens only. Mucinous adenocarcinoma tended to be less common in cases with positive blood specimens. In KRAS-positive patients with lung metastasis only, only one nonmucinous adenocarcinoma had a positive blood sample, and the others all had mucinous adenocarcinomas with positive tissue samples only. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the detection rate of KRAS-positive lung cancers detected by blood and tissue samples differs, and that the detection rate of blood samples may be poor, especially in the case of mucinous adenocarcinoma with lung metastases only.

Real-World Outcome Analysis of Patients With Stage IV NSCLC Treated With Tyrosine Kinase and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Introduction: Only a few reports have determined whether recently advanced anticancer drugs, particularly next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), prolong the survival of patients with NSCLC in the real world. Methods: To evaluate the association between recently advanced drugs and patient survival, survival data of 2078 patients with stage IV NSCLC from 1995 to 2022 were analyzed in the present study. The patients were classified into the following six groups in terms of the date of diagnosis: period A, 1995 to 1999; period B, 2000 to 2004; period C, 2005 to 2009; period D, 2010 to 2014; period E, 2015 to 2019; and period F, 2000 to 2022. They were further grouped in terms of EGFR mutation and ALK fusion. Results: The median overall survival (mOS) times were 8.9, 11.0, 13.6, 17.9, and 25.2 months in periods A to E, respectively, and the mOS time was not reached in period F. This time was significantly longer in period E than in period D (25.2 versus 17.9 mo, p < 0.005). Moreover, the mOS times of patients with EGFR mutation, those with ALK fusion, and those without both alterations were significantly longer in period E than in period D (46.0 versus 32.0 mo, p < 0.005; not reached versus 36.2 mo, p = 0.018; 14.6 versus 11.7 mo, p < 0.005). The history of treatment with next-generation TKIs and ICIs was found to be associated with overall survival. Conclusions: The survival of patients with NSCLC was improved from period D to period E, regardless of the presence of driver gene alteration. We found that next-generation TKIs and ICIs may be associated with improvements in overall survival.

A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes of Lorlatinib After Alectinib in Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC in Japan.

Introduction: Lorlatinib is an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in Japan for the treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. There has been little evidence about lorlatinib efficacy after first-line (1L) alectinib in clinical practice in Japan. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC previously treated with 1L alectinib at multiple sites in Japan. Primary objectives were to collect patient demographics at baseline and estimate time to treatment failure (TTF) with second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) or later line (≥3L) lorlatinib treatment. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR) with lorlatinib, reason for discontinuation and time to last treatment failure with lorlatinib, TTF and ORR of alectinib, and combined TTF. Results: Among the 51 patients included in the study, 29 (56.9%) received 2L and 22 (43.1%) received ≥3L lorlatinib treatment. At lorlatinib initiation, brain metastases were reported in 25 patients (49.0%), and 32 (62.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Median TTF with lorlatinib was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6-13.8) in any line, 10.8 months (95% CI: 3.9-13.8) in 2L, and 11.5 months (95% CI: 2.9-not reached) in ≥3L. Median TTF was 11.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-not reached) in patients with brain metastases at lorlatinib initiation and 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.3-13.8) in patients without brain metastases. ORR was 35.7% with any-line lorlatinib treatment. Conclusions: Patient characteristics and efficacy were comparable with previous reports when lorlatinib was given after 1L alectinib in patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

Subsequent treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that progressed after definitive chemoradiotherapy and consolidation therapy with durvalumab: a multicenter retrospective analysis (TOPGAN 2021-02).

PURPOSE: For patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) that progressed after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and durvalumab consolidation therapy, no subsequent standard treatment exists. The type of treatment selected for each timing of disease progression and its efficacy have not been investigated. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled patients with LA-NSCLC or inoperable NSCLC that progressed after definitive CRT and durvalumab consolidation therapy at 15 Japanese institutions. Patients were classified into the following: Early Discontinuation group (disease progression within 6 months after durvalumab initiation), Late Discontinuation group (disease progression from 7 to 12 months after durvalumab initiation), and Accomplishment group (disease progression from 12 months after durvalumab initiation). RESULTS: Altogether, 127 patients were analyzed, including 50 (39.4%), 42 (33.1%) and 35 (27.5%) patients from the Early Discontinuation, Late Discontinuation, and Accomplishment groups, respectively. Subsequent treatments were Platinum plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in 18 (14.2%), ICI in 7 (5.5%), Platinum in 59 (46.4%), Non-Platinum in 35 (27.6%), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor in 8 (6.3%) patients. In the Early Discontinuation, Late Discontinuation, and Accomplishment groups, 4 (8.0%), 7 (16.7%), and 7 (20.0%) patients were receiving Platinum plus ICI; 21 (42.0%), 22 (52.4%), and 16 (45.7%) were receiving Platinum, and 20 (40.0%), 8 (19.0%), and 7 (20.0%) were receiving Non-Platinum, respectively. No significant difference in progression-free survival was observed in the timing of disease progression. CONCLUSION: In patients with LA-NSCLC hat progressed after definitive CRT and durvalumab consolidation therapy, subsequent treatment may change depending on the timing of disease progression.

Effectiveness and Safety of Atezolizumab Monotherapy in Previously Treated Japanese Patients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent NSCLC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (J-TAIL).

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in previously treated patients with NSCLC have been established in the registrational phase 3 OAK trial. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in a large real-world cohort to confirm the reproducibility of the results of the registrational trial. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with previously treated NSCLC scheduled to receive atezolizumab monotherapy were enrolled. The primary end point was the 18-month overall survival (OS) rate. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs was evaluated. Results: Overall, 1002 patients were included in the safety analysis set and 1000 in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Of the full analysis set, 62% were ineligible for the OAK trial (OAK-unlike subpopulation). The 18-month OS rate was 41.1%, with a median OS of 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2-15.1). The 18-month OS rate was 49.4% and 36.1% in OAK-like and OAK-unlike subpopulations, respectively; that in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 was 14.3%. The incidence of AEs overall, in the OAK-like, and OAK-unlike subpopulations was 43.9%, 46.2%, and 42.5%; that of immune-related AEs was 19.0%, 20.1%, and 18.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The findings suggest that atezolizumab may be effective and safe for previously treated patients with NSCLC in real-world settings; however, atezolizumab administration should be considered carefully regarding the benefit-risk balance for the OAK-unlike subpopulation, especially in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor as a predictive biomarker for poor efficacy of combination treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) suppresses effector T-cells. Few studies have assessed serum sIL-2R in patients receiving immunotherapy. We evaluated the association between serum sIL-2R levels and the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1/ programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibody combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between 8/2019 and 8/2020 and measured their serum sIL-2R. The patients were divided into high and low sIL-2R groups based on the median of sIL-2R levels at pretreatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the high and low sIL-2R groups were compared. The Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS were evaluated using the log-rank test. The multivariate analysis of PFS and OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazard models. Among 54 patients (median age 65, range 34-84), 39 were male and 43 had non-squamous cell carcinoma. The sIL-2R cut-off value was 533 U/mL. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.5 months) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.3-not reached [NR] months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.007), respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.0-NR months) and NR (95% CI, 10.3-NR months) in the high and low sIL-2R groups (P = 0.005), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high sIL-2R was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS. SIL-2R may be a biomarker for the poor efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with chemotherapy.

Multicentre real-world data of ramucirumab plus docetaxel after combined platinum-based chemotherapy with programmed death-1 blockade in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NEJ051 (REACTIVE study).

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) is a promising treatment for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its clinical significance after platinum-based chemotherapy plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade remains unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the clinical significance of RD as a second-line treatment after the failure of chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, 288 patients with advanced NSCLC who received RDas second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade, at 62 Japanese institutions from January 2017 to August 2020, were included. Prognostic analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Prognostic factor analyses were performed using a Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were enrolled: 222 were men (77.1%), 262 were aged <75 years (91.0%), 237 (82.3%) had smoking history and 269 (93.4%) had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. One hundred ninety-nine patients (69.1%) were classified as adenocarcinoma (AC) and 89 (30.9%) as non-AC. The types of PD-1 blockade used in the first-line treatment were anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody in 236 (81.9%) and 52 (18.1%) patients, respectively. The objective response rate for RD was 28.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7-34.4). The disease control rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 64.1-75.0).The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-4.6) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, non-AC and PS 2-3 were independent prognostic factors for worse progression free survival , while bone metastasis on diagnosis, PS 2-3 and non-AC were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. INTERPRETATION: RD is a feasible second-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC who had received combined chemo-immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000042333.

Advances in the treatment of postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer and their impact on survival in Asian patients.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy on survival after postoperative recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or more with complete pathological resection between 2008 and 2018 (N = 2254). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Survival trends and the effect of TKIs/immunotherapy were analyzed using Joinpoint (National Cancer Institute) and Cox regression. RESULTS: In 443 (19.7%) postoperative recurrences, median time to recurrence was 1.1 years; epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFR+), 191 (43.1%); anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement (ALK+), 13 (2.9%); not detected or unknown (ND), 239 (54.0%). In multivariable analysis, age, time to recurrence, adenocarcinoma, symptomatic recurrence, any treatment for recurrence, use of the epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, use of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase TKI, and use of immunotherapy were significant prognostic factors. Survival was significantly better in the EGFR+/ALK+ group than in the ND group (median, 4.7 vs 2.1 years; P < .01). Between 2010 and 2018, 2-year postrecurrence survival improved significantly (annual percentage change [APC], 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0). In subset analyses, neither change in 2-year survival nor TKI use was significant over time in the EGFR+/ALK+ group, but the ND group experienced significant improvement in 2-year survival (APC, 13.5; 95% CI, 5.4-22.2) and increasing trend in immunotherapy use (APC, 23.0; 95% CI, -5.9 to 60) after 2013. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after postoperative recurrence of NSCLC has improved significantly since 2010. Use of immunotherapy in patients without driver mutations may have contributed to that improvement. Prognosis in patients with driver mutations remains favorable with the TKIs introduced before the study period.

Clinical efficacy of amrubicin in patients with small cell lung cancer relapse after first-line treatment including immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective multicenter study (TOPGAN 2021-01).

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic anticancer drugs has been reported to be enhanced after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer; however, it is unclear whether the same is applicable for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We evaluated the efficacy of second-line amrubicin (AMR) following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI combination therapy (chemo-ICI) in SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with SCLC treated with AMR as a second-line following chemo-ICI as first-line between July 2019 and April 2021 from 16 institutions throughout Japan. We investigated the therapeutic effectiveness, safety, and efficacy-enhancing variables of AMR. RESULTS: Overall, 89 patients treated with AMR after first-line chemo-ICI were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.2% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 20.1-39.8) and median PFS (m PFS) was 2.99 months (95% CI, 2.27-3.65). Patients who relapsed more than 90 days after receiving first-line platinum combination therapy (sensitive relapse) exhibited greater ORR (58.3% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.035) and m PFS (5.03 vs. 2.56 months, p = 0.019) than patients who relapsed in <90 days (refractory relapse). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were mainly hematological toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that the therapeutic effect of AMR was not enhanced after ICI on SCLC. However, AMR may be effective in cases of sensitive relapse after chemo-ICI. There was no increase in severe toxicity associated with AMR after ICI.

Real-World Data Analysis of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for NSCLC Using Japanese Postmarketing All-Case Surveillance Data.

Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor that was initially indicated for monotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. The Japanese Lung Cancer Society conducted an observational study on pembrolizumab using confirmative data obtained through postmarketing all-case surveillance (PMACS), which was performed by a pharmaceutical company under the Japanese law in 2017. Methods: This multicenter observational study was conducted by the Japanese Lung Cancer Society using PMACS data with the newly created central registration system regarding patients with NSCLC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy between February 1, 2017 and June 30, 2017; a new database was created by adding the clinical information regarding prognosis for 3 years after therapy to the existing data collected by PMACS. Results: A total of 300 patients from 43 facilities were enrolled in this study. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after pembrolizumab initiation were 558 and 188 days, respectively. Moreover, the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 58.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Results of multivariate analysis revealed performance status (p < 0.0001), histology (p = 0.0118), previous chemotherapy (p = 0.0007), programmed death-ligand 1 expression status (p = 0.0195), and previous steroid use (p = 0.0460) as significant factors that affected overall survival. The toxicity profile was similar to that previously reported. Conclusions: In this first attempt to use PMACS data, we successfully collected clinical information and found the real-world efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab.

EGFR-TKI re-administration after osimertinib failure in T790M mutation loss cases with re-biopsy.

Data on the re-administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after osimertinib failure in patients with T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration efficacy may vary between patients with T790M loss and those with T790M persistent with re-biopsy after osimertinib treatment. Patients who received EGFR-TKI re-administration (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib) after osimertinib failure were identified from our database. T790M mutation status before EGFR-TKI re-administration was analyzed via repeat biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of EGFR-TKI re-administration, especially differences according to the T790M mutation status, via repeat biopsy. Until June 2020, 28 patients received EGFR-TKI re-administration and 17 underwent repeat biopsy after osimertinib failure. Patients were divided into three groups, including the T790M loss group, where active mutation persisted and T790M was lost (13/17); T790M remaining group, where both the active mutation and T790M persisted (3/17); and active mutation loss group where both the active mutation and T790M were lost (1/17). The overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKI re-administration in the T790M loss group was 31% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 54%, which were higher than the ORR of 21% and DCR of 43% in the entire patient population. ORR and DCR of the not re-biopsy group were low (9% and 27%, respectively). The therapeutic effect of EGFR-TKI re-administration in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC after osimertinib failure is limited. EGFR-TKI re-administration may be considered in cases of T790M loss after repeat biopsy.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 overexpression mediates ALK inhibitor resistance in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

The rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) occurs in 3%-5% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confers sensitivity to ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). For the treatment of patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, various additional ALK-TKIs have been developed. Ceritinib is a second-generation ALK-TKI and has shown great efficacy in the treatment of patients with both newly diagnosed and crizotinib (a first-generation ALK-TKI)-refractory ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, tumors can also develop ceritinib resistance. This may result from secondary ALK mutations, but other mechanisms responsible for this have not been fully elucidated. In this study, we explored the mechanisms of ceritinib resistance by establishing ceritinib-resistant, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK-positive H3122 cells and ceritinib-resistant patient-derived cells. We identified a mechanism of ceritinib resistance induced by bypass signals that is mediated by the overexpression and activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). FGFR3 knockdown by small hairpin RNA or treatment with FGFR inhibitors was found to resensitize the resistant cells to ceritinib in vitro and in vivo. FGFR ligands from either human serum or fetal bovine serum were able to activate FGFR3 and induce ceritinib resistance. A detailed analysis of ceritinib-resistant patient-derived specimens confirmed that tyrosine-protein kinase Met (cMET) amplification induces ceritinib resistance. Amplified cMET counteractivated EGFR and/or Her3 and induced ceritinib resistance. These results reveal multiple ceritinib resistance mechanisms and suggest that ceritinib resistance might be overcome by identifying precise resistance mechanisms.

Rapid genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay with Genexus™ integrated sequencer.

Background: Genomic profiling of tumors from cancer patients facilitates molecular-guided therapy. The turnaround time is one of important issues to deliver results timely for clinical decisions. The Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer automates all next generation sequencing (NGS) workflows and delivers results within a day. Methods: In this study, we conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the detection rate of genomic alterations from cell-free total nucleic acid (cfTNA, containing cfDNA and cfRNA) of 119 non-small cell lung cancer using Oncomine Precision Assay on Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer. Oncomine Precision Assay (OPA) covers actionable mutations, copy number variations and fusion genes and that are applicable for the selection of targeted therapy. cfTNA isolated from plasma (derived from 14 ml of blood) were subjected to the Genexus system for library construction, templating, sequencing, and data analyses. Results: The sequencing resulted in median overall depth of 35,773× and median molecular coverage of 2,192× with cfTNA input ranged from 11 to 36 ng. Among the 119 samples evaluated, we detected at least one genomic alteration in plasma cfTNA of 79 cases (66%). When comparing to standard-of-care testing, the sensitivity and specificity of mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer related genes using liquid biopsy with Genexus-OPA ranged between 49-67% and 93-100%, respectively. 59% of actionable mutations, which were present in tumor tissues, were detected by the Genexus- Oncomine Precision Assay using plasma cfTNA. Among the 5 mutations detected from liquid biopsy only, three mutations are of level 1 evidence according to OncoKB database, highlighting the clinical utilities of liquid biopsy in addressing tumor heterogeneity. Extrathoracic metastasis and levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) are found to be associated with increased circulating tumor DNA detection. Conclusions: The Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer system is an automated, accurate NGS system with short turnaround time (TAT) that could assist clinicians to make more timely decision.